A Different Perspective on Global Warming
Saturday, March 24th, 2007This week, the US House and Senate were abuzz when former Presidential candidate Al Gore arrived to address the bodies on the dangers of global warming, and the need for Congress to pass legislation to limit it. Gore called for regulations to limit carbon emissions, ban incandescent light bulbs, ban coal-fired plants that can’t capture carbon, and create a new “Carbon Neutral Mortgage Association”, modeled after Fannie Mae, to promote construction of energy efficient homes.
Gore spoke as if human-induced global warming was the absolute truth and settled science.
Georgia congressman John Linder reminds us in an op-ed that ran in the Washington Times last month of another generally accepted scientific theory that had the support of politicians and the media at the time — the theory of eugenics.
Even though the eugenics theory fell apart after Hitler used it as a justification for the Holocaust, Linder notes that many of the scientists supported the theory because the institutions that provided their funding wanted it that way.
Linder also notes that the most prevalent greenhouse gas is water vapor, but since it can’t be controlled the way C02 emissions can, no one is going after it. He also points out that termites have been estimated to produce more C02 annually than the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels.
Speaking to a group of Gwinnett Republicans recently, Linder said that after the article was published, he was contacted by a number of scientists that shared his skepticism.
So, before you believe everything that’s in Algore’s Inconvenient Truth, take a look at John’s article, and think about what might really be motivating those who propose restricting America’s economy in the name of the environment.
Sphere: Related Content